Physics Electronics PMDC Conceptual Practice
PMDC Verified Question 20 of 494
The theoretical maximum rectification efficiency (\(\eta_{\text{max}}\)) of a full-wave center-tapped or bridge rectifier circuit without a filter is:
A
\(40.6\%\)
B
\(50.0\%\)
C
\(81.2\%\)
D
\(90.5\%\)
Tap any option to test your recall and reveal the step-by-step Propolis autopsy.

Propolis Cognitive Error Autopsy

Official Correct Choice:
Option C: \(81.2\%\)
Concept:

Full-wave rectifiers convert both half-cycles of the AC input into DC, yielding twice the conversion efficiency of a half-wave rectifier.

Formula:

$$\eta_{\text{max}} = \frac{P_{\text{dc}}}{P_{\text{ac}}} = \frac{(2I_0 / \pi)^2 R_L}{(I_0 / \sqrt{2})^2 R_L} = \frac{8}{\pi^2}$$

Solution:

  • Evaluating the mathematical constant:


  • $$\eta_{\text{max}} = \frac{8}{(3.14159)^2} = \frac{8}{9.8696} \approx 0.8116 = 81.2\%$$


  • Thus, the maximum theoretical efficiency of a full-wave rectifier is \(81.2\%\).


Why other options are incorrect:

  • Option A: \(40.6\%\) is the maximum efficiency of a half-wave rectifier.
  • Option B: \(50.0\%\) is a common misconception assuming linear ratio instead of sinusoidal integration.
  • Option D: \(90.5\%\) is mathematically incorrect for an unfiltered full-wave sine output.

Quality & Fidelity Assurance: Every question on BeambePrep is rigorously curated against the official PMDC syllabus with zero filler, zero out-of-syllabus content, and zero typos. When an authentic past paper originally contained a historical mistake or ambiguity from the examining board (such as UHS or NUMS), BeambePrep faithfully reflects the original paper while detailing the nuance and scientific consensus in the autopsy above.

Want to solve full-length papers under timed exam conditions?

Practice with zero-scroll lockdown sprints, dynamic latency zone timers, live peer selection telemetry, and the automated Amber mistake recovery loop.